Who the difference between Barry Bonds or Bill Belichick?

November 28th, 2008 | by bonds |
MuddButt asked:


The only one I can think of is that Barry Bonds did get caught. Oh and their both cheaters.
I mean What’s
ILconservative– You are so true on belichick’s dressing. He looks like he stinks wearing those damn sweatshirts.

LAURENCE
Bonds - Bookmark and Share Your Favorites... These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Ask
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Live-MSN
  • Netscape
  • Squidoo
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • YahooMyWeb

  1. 16 Responses to “Who the difference between Barry Bonds or Bill Belichick?”

  2. By Austin N is Back on Nov 30, 2008 | Reply

    REY

    Bond plays baseball and bill plays football

    Bond roots for USC and bill roots for USC

    Fight ON!!

    Root for USC

  3. By T D on Dec 2, 2008 | Reply

    WINFORD

    do you mean what is the difference between the two? I would say your right they are both cheaters and should be banned from their sports respectively.

  4. By a_talis_man on Dec 4, 2008 | Reply

    RUFUS

    Bonds is a liar and a cheater
    Belicheck is just a cheater

  5. By Peter V on Dec 6, 2008 | Reply

    WHITNEY

    welp, Barry Bonds is a big black baseball player, Bill belichick is a medium size white football coach.
    Bill is older than Barry.
    Barry hits more homeruns than bill…
    Bill knows more about football than barry.
    Barry knows more about baseball than Bill.
    Bill coaches new england, Barry doesnt..
    Barry plays for the Giants, Bill doesnt.
    and the list goes on and on….

  6. By RWB4646 on Dec 8, 2008 | Reply

    MASON

    Bill Belichick cheated and then said he didn’t understand the rule against cheating . ( yeah right )
    Barry Bonds cheated and then lied about it .
    I see the “idiot” for USC is here !

  7. By Tim on Dec 11, 2008 | Reply

    LOWELL

    Barry Bonds didn’t get caught. Belickick did get caught. The difference is that the press already hated Barry Bonds. Barry doesn’t work with the press at all. As a matter of fact, he started his own website long ago to answer all the fans directly. That way he wouldn’t ever have to deal with the press. The press do not like this. As soon as the steroid scandal broke, the press jumped all over Barry. It was kinda weird. Because guys like Sammy Sosa, Mark McGwire, and Jason Giambi would have been a lot easier to pin things on. Sense, ya know, they admitted it.
    Bill Belichick on the other hand has always been a well respected man. Everyone loves Belichick. Almost the day the story broke, 1/3 of the articles I read were, “Forgive him” pieces.

    Two simple lessons; It’s not what you do to get in trouble, it’s how you act up to that point. And, for the most part, people agree with the press.

  8. By dCon on Dec 13, 2008 | Reply

    STANFORD

    Belichick illegally taped defensive signals to gain an advantage for his offense. And probably vice versa for his defense. The fact of the matter is his team still had to execute. His team still had little or no advantage in the execution department, everyone still had to do their job. Bonds cheating was an advantage in the execution department. The steroids gave Barry an advantage of strength and speed. Without the steroids, a majority of those home runs hit by Bonds wouldve just been deep fly balls. Bonds cheating gave one man an immediate advantage in execution. Belichick cheating gave 11 men an advantage in the preparation department.

  9. By jo m on Dec 14, 2008 | Reply

    PASQUALE

    TD is a Jets fan,huh?

  10. By greggymcgurks on Dec 17, 2008 | Reply

    STACY

    Ok… Barry Bonds illegally enhanced his body with drugs… even though he didn’t have too, he was a great player before he juiced up. Bill Belicheck taped another team’s sideline & scoreboard… and if you’ve seen the tape there was no competitive advantage gained, which means… Belicheck didn’t cheat. Bonds actually put that crap in his body to gain a competitive edge… Belicheck taped the opposing sideline for future reference against a division rival. What he had was no different then the films they recieve for gameplanning from the NFL anyway. His interpretation of the rule was that it was ok as long as there was no competitive edge gained in the game and it was for future reference. You can’t say that someone was cheating when they weren’t using it in said game. Barry Bonds cheater… though he didn’t have to be… Belicheck… not a cheater… fans just need an excuse.

  11. By ILconservative on Dec 18, 2008 | Reply

    TOBY

    Barry Bonds knows how to dress and realizes a cut off sleeved sweatshirt isn’t necessary to be comfortable. They are both jerks and poor sports though.

  12. By Pattyboy on Dec 19, 2008 | Reply

    LUCIEN

    The color of their skin…..other than that they are both cheaters and should be banned for life from their respective Sport …..And i don’t mean that in a prejudice way so please don’t take my answer in that fashion

  13. By rushville1006 on Dec 20, 2008 | Reply

    JOHNNIE

    greggymcgurks,

    I bet you’re right. I bet you were on the NFL Commissioner’s investigative team that reviewed the tape and found there was absolutley no competitive advantage. Otherwise you wouldn’t be acting as if you saw the tape.

    Note: Sarcasm is funny when used against morons like greggymcgurks.

    If there was no cheating then why did the NFL Commissioner see fit to fine the man $500,000 and consider suspending him?

  14. By Che on Dec 22, 2008 | Reply

    SHERWOOD

    and now we know why they call u muddbut.

  15. By tonydgr8 on Dec 23, 2008 | Reply

    VERNON

    What’s the difference between “their” and “they’re”?

  16. By t-shirt on Dec 24, 2008 | Reply

    LEN

    color thats about it i think they both did something stupid and they should both take a break

  17. By Karen on Dec 24, 2008 | Reply

    LAVERNE

    Oh, I don’t know - maybe because Bonds broke a FEDERAL law, not just a league one.

Post a Comment